The number of my friends and acquaintances that have faced a loss of dream due to a sudden family crisis is huge.
Talented folks in our town: talking about advanced Maths and literature and Physics laid their dreams in advancement and pursued the course of debatable religious fervor to compensate for their inactivity in their chosen path towards the advancement of learning and one hopes imparting the ir understanding.
The real talents that they nursed to better themselves hit the walls in the system coupled with the ever increasing realization of evolving through life.
The conditions the evolving circumstances impose on the growth on the individual is limited chiefly by their environment and the support
structure of the locality.
I desists from the use of the word community instead to compensate the lack of my understanding of the contemporary definition of community.
How many such individuals have novel minds that could be put to the betterment of the learning. When researchers evolve outside our borders the penchant to admire and envy exceeds the limits of imagination.
For what I read the validation of an external entity is the defining tribute that convinces the locality of the importance of the novel mind.
Countless individuals are testimony to the lack of opportunities that prevail within this framework that fails to account for the talents of the novel minds.
If my understanding is right the cultures outside our contemporary understanding of life and of knowlege; have implicitly included provisions in their to include this minority that to put it coarsely- see the world differently than the majority.
It is quite tempting to be the rebel and talk about the flaws and possibly the remedy ranging a wide range of issues in recent times.
But I simply limit my point to the technologists. We as a locality need to have a safety net in place for people who see things differently as a result of the over indulgence of technological learning.
This sort of learning changes the way people think about thr reality. Had it been any other place they would have been brought to think about advancement in technological learning as a lifestyle.
Where one progresses in a path that leads to discovery and innovation.
Instead the system promotes a saturation and limits the latent innovations that are just under the limit of societal upbringing and environmentally imposed restrictions on
This situation is exacerbated by the need to make judgements about the individuals capability to excellence in exigent circumstances.
The system favors the readymade rather than the piece that could tailored to the evolving Fashions of the time.
One so malleable and able gets left out because of the made up rules the for the input during the judgement call in the neural net of the judge’s biased views towards learning and innovation in a character exhibiting the frustrations of the limiting nature of the system; that is clearly not fault tolerant to humans exhibiting resistance to stagnation in their learning and advancement of it in thr technology sphere.
Until one solves this problem of stigmatizing folks termed with severe emotional disturbances brought about by the lack of realizing their potential in this functioning system with a valid feedback loop to reinforce the validity; to eventually enable self-validation.
This problem is going to be perennial in this locality and the contemporary time.